crittersheep ([personal profile] crittersheep) wrote2024-03-15 10:32 pm

GAME GROUP FOUR

[YOU'RE SUDDENLY...In a court of sorts?? Unsure. Maybe it's Civil Court. More importantly, you notice you've each taken on new forms.



WHUH OH. There's a faceless crowd watching the proceedings, murmuring like a Phoenix Wright crowd. Lethe finds his paw banging the gavel automatically. Court is in session.]

[RULES | PEONY MINGLE | DAFF MINGLE | JUDGE NOTES | R1 | R2 | R3 ]
sparksystem: (M10)

Re: ROUND 1 DEBATE

[personal profile] sparksystem 2024-03-16 03:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I would most likely win in a fight against Biscuit-san.
hardpity: (309)

Re: ROUND 1 DEBATE

[personal profile] hardpity 2024-03-16 03:29 pm (UTC)(link)
Since we represent the 'prey' animals and we could probably win in a tag-team fight against the other team obviously we win, right?
sparksystem: (M05)

Re: ROUND 1 DEBATE

[personal profile] sparksystem 2024-03-16 03:30 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes. That makes the most sense.
hardpity: (385)

Re: ROUND 1 DEBATE

[personal profile] hardpity 2024-03-16 03:33 pm (UTC)(link)
... but we probably shouldn't...
sparksystem: (M08)

Re: ROUND 1 DEBATE

[personal profile] sparksystem 2024-03-16 03:34 pm (UTC)(link)
. . .









In a contest of strength the most direct path to victory is to defeat the opponent.
hardpity: (393)

Re: ROUND 1 DEBATE

[personal profile] hardpity 2024-03-16 03:38 pm (UTC)(link)
Well, yeah...
sparksystem: (M02)

Re: ROUND 1 DEBATE

[personal profile] sparksystem 2024-03-16 03:41 pm (UTC)(link)
It would prove a point.
hardpity: (343)

Re: ROUND 1 DEBATE

[personal profile] hardpity 2024-03-16 03:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Also it'd be easier than arguing.
sparksystem: (M01)

Re: ROUND 1 DEBATE

[personal profile] sparksystem 2024-03-16 03:47 pm (UTC)(link)
The criteria is too vague and subjective for a proper debate. And there's no evidence either of us can provide besides words which makes it even more subjective. We should demand a retrial.